Friday, November 16, 2012
Even U.S. Postal Service recorded a loss
The struggling U.S. Postal Service on Thursday reported an annual loss of a record $15.9 billion and forecast more red ink in 2013, capping a tumultuous year in which it was forced to default on billions in payments to avert bankruptcy. The financial losses for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30 were more than triple the $5.1 billion loss in the previous year. Having reached its borrowing limit, the mail agency is operating with little cash on hand, putting it at risk in the event of an unexpectedly large downturn in the economy. "It's critical that Congress do its part and pass comprehensive legislation before they adjourn this year to move the Postal Service further down the path toward financial health," said Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe, calling the situation "our own postal fiscal cliff."
Much of the red ink in 2012 was due to mounting mandatory costs for future retiree health benefits, which made up $11.1 billion of the losses. Without that and other related labor expenses, the mail agency sustained an operating loss of $2.4 billion, lower than the previous year. Donahoe said the post office has been able to reduce costs significantly by boosting worker productivity. But he said the mail agency has been hampered by congressional inaction on a postal overhaul bill that would allow it to eliminate Saturday mail delivery and reduce its $5 billion annual payment for future health benefits. "We cannot sustain large losses indefinitely. Major defaults are unsettling," said Donahoe, who made clear that the Postal Service would now be profitable had Congress acted earlier this year.
Earlier this year, the post office defaulted on two of the health prepayments for the first time in its history. The Postal Service, an independent agency, does not receive tax money for its day-to-day operations but is subject to congressional control. The Senate passed a postal bill in April that would have provided financial relief in part by reducing the annual health payments and providing a multibillion-dollar cash infusion, basically a refund of overpayments the Postal Service made to a federal pension fund. The House, however, remains stalled over its own legislation that would allow for aggressive cuts, including an immediate end to Saturday delivery.
It remained unclear whether House leadership would take up the postal bill in its current lame-duck session. Rural lawmakers are resisting action, worried about closures of postal facilities in their communities. Congress is focused now on a Jan. 1 deadline to avert across-the-board tax increases and spending cuts known as the "fiscal cliff." While urging quick congressional action, the Postal Service acknowledged the uncertainty in its legal filings on Thursday, which anticipate that Congress will fail to act. But Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and is a sponsor of the House bill, has said he believes postal legislation can be passed this year. "The U.S. Postal Service is clearly marching toward a financial collapse of its own," said Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., a sponsor of the Senate bill. "I am hopeful that now that the elections are over, my colleagues and I can come together and pass postal reform legislation so that a final bill can be signed into law by the end of the year."
Overall, the post office had operating revenue of $65.2 billion in fiscal 2012, down $500 million from the previous year. Expenses climbed to $81 billion, up from $70.6 billion, largely due to the health prepayments. The annual payment of roughly $5.6 billion had been deferred for a year in 2011, resulting in a double payment totaling $11.1 billion that became due this year. The Postal Service is the only government agency required to make such payments. The post office also has been rocked by declining mail volume as people and businesses continue switching to email and other online options in place of letters and paper bills. The number of items mailed in the last year was 159.9 billion pieces, a 5 percent decrease. Much of the decline came in first-class mail.
On the plus side, the mail agency reported that its fast-growing shipping services, which include express and priority mail, grew by 9 percent, helping to offset much of the declining revenue from first-class mail. Donahoe said package volume also is expected to jump by 20 percent this holiday season compared to the same period last year, boosted by increased consumer purchases on e-Bay, Amazon.com and other Internet shopping sites.
Joseph Corbett, chief financial officer for the Postal Service, said the mail agency expects to operate for the first half of next year with about four days of cash reserves, a low amount which he described as unheard of for any well-run business. Cash levels dipped perilously close to zero last month before bouncing higher due to a surge in election-related mail. In all, campaign mailings and mail-in ballots helped bring in $500 million, a new high and roughly double the amount in the 2008 election year. "We are far short of liquidity," Corbett said.
Fredric Rolando, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers, blamed Congress for mandating the annual health prepayments in 2006, which have contributed significantly to the Postal Service's financial woes. But he suggested that lawmakers might be wiser to act on legislation next year, rather than acting too hastily. His union is opposed to the current version of the House bill, which gives the Postal Service wide leeway to close post offices and make employee cuts to balance its budget. "Rather than rushing through a flawed bill in a lame-duck session, the new Congress should start over in January and develop constructive legislation that fixes pre-funding. That would eliminate the biggest drain on postal finances," Rolando said.
Last month, the post office said it will increase postage rates on Jan. 27, including a 1-cent increase in the cost of first-class mail, to 46 cents. The rate increase, which is tied to the rate of overall inflation, will make only a small dent in financial losses. The Postal Service also originally sought to close low-revenue post offices in rural areas to save money, but after public opposition, it is now moving forward with a new plan to keep 13,000 of them open with shorter operating hours.
Without legislative changes, it said, annual losses will exceed $21 billion by 2016.
"If Congress fails to act, there could be postal slowdowns or shutdowns that would have catastrophic consequences for the 8 million private sector workers whose jobs depend on the mail," said Art Sackler, co-coordinator of the Coalition for a 21st Century Postal Service, a group representing the private sector mailing industry.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Friday, June 8, 2012
10 behaviors of the hyper-successful
(from MoneyWatch)
Money and its material manifestations are the most typical measures of a person's professional success, but they're not always telling or even accurate: We all know it's possible to buy nice things without being financially successful (debt is an unfortunately common substitute for net worth). So I rarely make assumptions about a person's business or other financial accomplishments based on clothes, cars, boats or houses.
Knowing and dealing with many highly successful people, I've found that there are behaviors and characteristics that are much less superficial and more telling than just acquiring status symbols. In my observation of ultra-high achievers, the more professionally successful they are:
- The less stuff they carry: The most successful people I know never carry laptops, briefcases or much of anything else, other than (usually two) phones.
- The fewer calls they answer or return: Even with those two phones, top dogs rarely return calls that aren't critical to their own business or personal needs.
- The harder they are to reach by anyone or any means.
- The less time they spend at a computer.
- The shorter their e-mails. You might say that Alphas use less alphabet.
- The less social media they use (except for celebrities).
- The less they know, stay current, or care about pop culture (again, except for celebrities).
- The less TV they watch (except sports, especially anything involving their alma maters).
- The more non-leisure stuff they do that's not directly related to their business (charities, boards, outside investments).
- The more newspapers they take off the flight attendant's cart in First Class (unless they're on their own plane, which makes all the other points moot).
Some of these behaviors are obvious, some may seem ironic, and of course none are meant to suggest that business and money are the only measures of a successful life. Some of the observations are made with a little ribbing intended, and none are scientific, though I'll bet they could be: I don't know a single mega-successful business person who doesn't exhibit at least half of these traits.
Truth be told, much of the list doesn't bode well for me, much less my shot at that sweet Gulfstream 650 I've had my eye on. I carry a laptop (I sort of have to, since I make bags for them), I return more calls and messages than I ignore, I only have one phone, and I'm not well-known for brevity in my e-mails. And for the most part, I don't care -- I don't like some of these characteristics in others, and there are parts of my life, personality and business behavior that I'm not interested in changing. If that keeps me out of the most rarified air, so be it.
But there is an important central theme that's valuable to all of us, regardless of where we are on the ladder, whether we admire these behaviors or are put off by them, or whether the list accurately reflects our own style or aspirations. No matter what combination of these characteristics the Masters of the Universe might possess, the bottom line is the same: Without exception, the people at the very top of the business ladder don't waste time.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
10 things great bosses do
(from MoneyWatch)
In the best of all worlds, executive compensation, shareholder value, operating goals, management objectives, and employee needs are all perfectly aligned. If you ever find a company like that, keep it to yourself. Nobody will believe you. It should come as no surprise that perfect companies are about as easy to find as perfect bosses and perfect spouses. It just doesn't happen. Come to think of it, if you look in the mirror and don't see plenty of flaws, you're delusional. And companies are entirely made up of imperfect people, just like you.
Even after 100,000 years of natural selection, the human race has evolved to the point where our organizations are nearly as effective as a colony of ants with defective antennas. That's right, we still have a long way to go. Sobering thought, I know. And yet, for all the Yahoos, HPs, RIMs, Sprints, Sonys, Kodaks, Nokias, Bank of Americas, and all the executives that turned these once-great brands into laughing stocks, there's still the occasional Apple or IBM to give us hope.
It may be an imperfect world, but there are still managers who more or less know what they're doing -- after they've had their morning coffee. Here's my take on what high-performance managers do -- or are at least supposed to do -- to motivate their teams and deliver results:
- Help the company achieve its strategic and operating goals by making smart business decisions and managing their team effectively.
- Entrust their employees with as much responsibility as their capabilities will allow and hold them accountable for the same.
- Behave like a mature adult -- genuine and empathetic -- even when their employees or their management are acting out like spoiled children.
- Provide their employees with the tools, training, and support they need to effectively achieve challenging but reasonably attainable goals.
- Promote a can-do, customer service attitude with customers and stakeholders by walking the talk and leading by example.
- Promote their team's accomplishments and take the heat for their failures.
- Provide genuine feedback, both good and bad, to their employees, peers, and management. Request the same from them.
- Work their tail off and be hands-on when necessary. If they don't, they can't expect anybody else to do it either.
- Don't compromise their ethical principles in the name of "the ends justify the means" or for any other reason.
- Strike a balance between shielding their folks from the ripples of dysfunctional management and openly communicating events that may affect them.
Overall, the best managers create a work environment where people feel challenged, do their best, and are held accountable for meeting their commitments. But most importantly, they're key components in an organization that exists to serve its customers and shareholders. We're all happiest working for a successful company.
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
He's too friendly
Ok, this is a true story which just happened today. The Program Management department in my company now has 1 SVP (my asshole ex-boss), 1 AVP and 1 Associate. They are assisted by 4 secondees from external consultancy company to assist on internal PM works. And they also have 2-3 consultants (from different consultant company) to do shared track initiatives.
The Management has given a directive to the ASSHOLE to take over the shared track PM from the 2-3 consultants by mid this year. This is partly to save costs as we have been paying millions to them (as compared to the puny salary that we get) and also to develop internal capabilities.
So, this afternoon the ASSHOLE had a chat with one of the consultants. The ASSHOLE requested the consultant to come up with transition and handover plan. The ASSHOLE also requested the consultant's help to assist, groom and guide the AVP (named F*za) and the Associate (named A*har) with anticipation that these two chaps will take over the consultants' roles in shared track.
The consultant is OK with the idea and willing to offer his assistance on the transition. But, before the consultant can say much further, came an advice from the ASSHOLE... "But be careful with A*har. He's too friendly with other people..."
Yupp! In the ASSHOLE dictionary, a Program Manager should not be friendly to others!
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
Amber, yellow and green
As a Program Manager (or a Project or Portfolio Manager), the three most important colors in your work are amber (or red), yellow and green. These colors are used to measure actual performance against target for which amber represents not meeting target, yellow means slightly off from the target while green means you're safe or within target.
This is a true story which just happened yesterday to one of my friends, a Program Manager, in my workplace.
She was asked by the Head of Program Management (who is an asshole) to report department spendings for January against budget. So, she duly prepared the report and obviously, as a Program Manager, she colored the cell (the report is in Excel) in accordance to the variance between actual spending against the budget. Amber being overspent, yellow being slightly over the budget and green for within the budget.
She sent the report via email to the Head of Program Management (who is an asshole).
To her surprise, the Head of Program Management (who is an asshole) replied the email within minutes. She thought that was efficient! And to her surprise also, the first line of the reply from the Head of Program Manager (who is an asshole) was...
"Hi F*za, there are too many colors in the report."
Can you believe that comes from the Head of Program Management?!! Owh... he's not just a Head of Program Management, he is an asshole! And you can figure out why I left Program Management and transfer to other department.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Progress monitoring?!
As a boss to Program or Project Management Office, surely you need to have overall view or overview on the progress of programs or projects in your company. One of the famous ways to do this is to have a 'war room' where you have projects/programs update with 'traffic light' indicator to tell you which programs/projects are on track or behind schedule/target.
But sometimes, a company would not have the luxury to convert a room into a 'war room', due to space limitation, etc. If that is the case, as a boss to the Program or Project Management Office, you have to sacrifice your room to be a 'replica' to the 'war room' by pasting programs/projects update on the wall of your room, like the one in this picture. Great! Sacrifice, they call it. And expect your sacrifices to be handsomely rewarded.
Hold on!
You are a boss of Program or Project Management Office. And all you have on the wall of your office (replica of the war room) is a sheet of A3 and a sheet of A4 paper to monitore your staff's annual leave like in the picture below.
What kind of Program/Project Management boss are you?
An asshole!
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Time clock
What kind of boss are you when...
Your staff stay back to finish their works when you're not around in office, and go home right on time (to the exact second) when you're around in office.
.
.
.
.
.
Don't think too hard...
.
.
You're just an asshole boss!
Thursday, December 4, 2008
When the asshole boss calls
An asshole boss normally calls you on weekends, or when you're away on leave. What should you do? Should you simply don't answer those calls, or you answer them but hang up soon after you answer them. Why not? Not brave enough?! Even President-Elect Barack Obama got hung up by one of his congresswoman.
(from Yahoo! News) On Wednesday, the Republican congresswoman got a call from President-elect Barack Obama, didn't believe it was him, and hung up on him. Twice. According to Ros-Lehtinen's flack Alex Cruz, the congresswoman received the call on her cell phone from a Chicago-based number and an aide informed her that Obama wanted to speak to her.
When Obama introduced himself, Ros-Lehtinen cut him off and said, "I'm sorry but I think this is a joke from one of the South Florida radio stations known for these pranks." Then she hung up. Moments later, Obama tried again, this time through his soon-to-be chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel. "Ileana, I cannot believe you hung up on the President-Elect," Emanuel said. And then--yes, you know what's coming--she hung up on Emanuel saying she "didn't believe the call was legitimate."
A short time later, Ros-Lehtinen received an urgent call from Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.), the chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, who informed her that she indeed hung up on Obama. So, Obama tried again and this time he was successful. (Phew!) "It is very funny that you have twice hung up on me," Obama said.
Ros Lehtinen responded by telling Obama that radio stations in South Florida always make these sorts of jokes. Obama said similar pranksters reside in Chi-town. "You are either very gracious to reach out in such a bipartisan manner or had run out of folks to call if you are truly calling me and Saturday Night Live could use a good Obama impersonator like you," Ros-Lehtinen joked with the president-elect.
So, the next time your asshole boss calls you on weekend or while you're away on leave, just hang up. When you got back to office, tell him "I thought the calls were from that stupid 'Kena Kantoi' radio show." Even if your boss got angry, at least it put a smile on your spouse's face!
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Human Capital? What a word!
We were doing the same thing before this 3 years things came years ago. But we never ordered, the human capital volunteered! They want to make improvement themselves. They knew what need to done, but need a little guidance, facilitation and cordination to get the whole organization on a single track. We shared our experience nationwide not just a corporate level success. Things are much better then, we knew a Kelantanese, Kedahan, Sarawakian, Sabahan at working levels and we communicated nationwide accross the board. We used to have the platfofm to know our colleagues in other states and that has given us a true meaning of working in organization.
We gave those up, for growth and other interested parties. Can we not have the balance in life, in a working enviroment? We may not be a world class but a world class in our human capital. When the human are happy the results will speaks for itself! But you need a lot of patience, lots of them and 3 years....you better have patience. The foundations that was built many years ago have gone, lost! and the rebuilding is painful..we were almost there then, when the new waves came and spoilt it all...
Human capital, human resource or people whatever you name it, it is just a name! How you treat these people is more important than changing names. If you treat them right and just, there ill follow. Human capital is like that, they have feelings and some are already tired of these never ending songs of changes.
I guess you guys need some thoughts to understand the soft part of human capital!
Adios!
Monday, December 1, 2008
A true leader
A true leader requires no bootlicking antics. If all leaders are 'true' leaders...
(taken from forwarded email)
The Norwegian newspaper VG has reported a truly amazing story about a newly-wed trying to get to Norway to be with her husband, and the stranger who helped pay an unexpected luggage surcharge. The blog 'Leisha's Random Thoughts' has translated the story:
It was 1988, and Mary Andersen was in line at the Miami airport checking in for a long flight to Norway to be with her husband. When it was finally Mary's turn, she got the message that would crush her bubbling feeling of happiness. "You'll have to pay a 103 dollar surcharge if you want to bring both those suitcases to Norway ," the man behind the counter said.
Mary had no money. Her new husband had travelled ahead of her to Norway , and she had no one else to call. "I was completely desperate and tried to think which of my things I could manage without. But I had already made such a careful selection of my most prized possessions," says Mary.
As tears streamed down her face, she heard a 'gentle and friendly voice' behind her saying, "That's okay, I'll pay for her." Mary turned around to see a tall man whom she had never seen before. He had a gentle and kind voice that was still firm and decisive. "The first thing I thought was, Who is this man?"
Although this happened 20 years ago, Mary still remembers the authority that radiated from the man. He was nicely dressed, with brown leather shoes, a cotton shirt open at the throat and khaki pants, says Mary.
She was thrilled to be able to bring both her suitcases to Norway and assured the stranger that he would get his money back. The man wrote his name and address on a piece of paper that he gave to Mary. She thanked him repeatedly. When she finally walked off towards the security checkpoint, he waved goodbye to her.
Who was the man? Barack Obama.
Twenty years later, she is thrilled that the friendly stranger at the airport may be the next President and has voted for him already and donated 100 dollars to his campaign:
"He was my knight in shining armor," says Mary, smiling.
She paid the 103 dollars back to Obama the day after she arrived in Norway . At that time he had just finished his job as a poorly paid community worker in Chicago , and had started his law studies at prestigious Harvard university.
Mary even convinced her parents to vote for him: In the spring of 2006 Mary's parents had heard that Obama was considering a run for president, but that he had still not decided. They chose to write a letter in which they told him that he would receive their votes. At the same time, they thanked Obama for helping their daughter 18 years earlier.
And Obama replied. In a letter to Mary's parents dated May 4th 2006 and stamped "United States Senate, Washington DC ' Barack Obama writes:
"I want to thank you for the lovely things you wrote about me and for reminding me of what happened at Miami airport. I'm happy I could help back then, and I'm delighted to hear that your daughter is happy in Norway. Please send her my best wishes. Sincerely, Barack Obama , United States Senator".
The parents sent the letter on to Mary.
Mary says that when her friends and associates talk about the election, especially when race relations is the heated subject, she relates the story of the kind man who helped out a stranger-in-need over twenty years ago, years before he had even thought about running for high office.
Ok, now ask from your boss $100! lol
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Athletics, yet an asshole
You’ve been hearing your asshole BOSS is athletic. Who cares? He is an asshole. Anyway and finally, if what you’ve been hearing is true, everyone in the company may find your asshole BOSS useful to the company especially during inter-department or inter-subsidiary companies sports carnival.
One day you had a conversation with your asshole BOSS…
You: So, what games do you play?
Asshole BOSS: Owh… I play all games.
You: Are you sure?!
Asshole BOSS: Ya ya!! I even do track and field.
You: Whoaa… track and field, too?! What event in track and field?
Asshole BOSS: All. Especially pecut (dash events)
You: 100m or 200m?
Asshole BOSS: Both I can.
You: So, you can take corners very well in 200m?
Asshole BOSS: That’s my favorite part. Oh yeah.. I also swim very well.
You: Really? What style?
Asshole BOSS: All laaa… especially the butterfly. That’s my favorite.
You: Butterfly?! That’s the most difficult.
Asshole BOSS: Of course, I’ve been swimming since I was a kid.
So, when the inter-subsidiary companies sport carnival came, your asshole BOSS was selected to play badminton. One reason for the selection was based on his claim, “I was the second team for Malaysia. I used to spar against Rashid Sidek.”
And when the tournament day arrived, not just your asshole BOSS didn’t get to play the men single matchup (as there are other better single players around), your asshole BOSS lost all four men’s doubles matchups and he claimed of muscle pull and crammed on his legs for his losses.
And at the end of the competition, one of your friends said, “If he was Rashid Sidek's sparring partner, his opponents must be Lin Dan’s sparring partner then!” There and there you feel like kicking your asshole BOSS into a swimming pool and see him doing the butterfly.
Oh well, your asshole BOSS is an asshole, anyway. Whatever comes from his mouth will go directly to the toilet bowl.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
Get him out?
You've been having problems (to sync) with your asshole BOSS. You requested for transfer, but was turned down by your asshole BOSS, although other BOSSES would love to take you in. All you could do is to find jobs elsewhere and resign from the current one.
You're making a good progress in getting a job somewhere else. But, suddenly you've been hearing there's a plot by the top ranked BOSSES to get your asshole BOSS out of the company. And they're seriously thinking about it. Even, statements like "why is he (your asshole BOSS) is also having trouble with his peers?" and "he's not articulate" keep cropping up.
So, what should you do?
Wait and hold on to the job til the top management get rid of your asshole BOSS, hoping you'll get a better replacement. Or keep looking for jobs?
I'll keep looking for jobs elsewhere. Who can assure the replacement would not be assholed as the current one? But, one thing you can be assured of... even others know your asshole BOSS is an asshole BOSS.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Laws of Power (Law #3 and #4)
There is one meeting that require your boss to attend. However, he couldn't attend the meeting because he is busy (like others are not?! fuck!). With limited resources, he has no other choice than to send you as representative to the meeting. But, he knows he couldn't trust that you will brief him what the meeting is all about. So, he called the organizer.
Your stupid Boss: About the meeting tomorrow... you know laa I'm very busy so it's a bit tight for me to attend.
Meeting organizer: Ok, so I'm assuming you're not attending.
Your stupid Boss: I'll send my staff, ***** to represent me.
Meeting organizer: Ok, noted. Will forward the invitation to him.
Your stupid Boss: But, can you send me the presentation materials, later? You know lah.. my staff won't share with me. He likes to work on his own...
Crap! What a boss without balls he is?
Next time you see him, put a satanic smile on your face and just tell him, "Law #3 and Law #4!"
----------
Law #3: Conceal your intentions
Keep people off-balance and in the dark by never revealing the purpose behind your actions. If they have no clue what you are up to, they cannot prepare a defense. Guide them far enough down the wrong path, envelope them in enough smoke, and by the time they realize your intentions, it will be too late.
Law #4: Always say less than necessary
When you are trying to impress people with words, the more you say, the more common you appear, and the less in control. Even if you are saying something banal, it will seem original if you make it vague, open-ended, and sphinxlike. Powerful people impress and intimidate by saying less. The more you say, the more likely you are to say something foolish.
Friday, October 31, 2008
Bullshitting?!
If you are a boss...
You'll know that you're a piece of shit if you can't talk to bosses of other departments to get some information on work and you need to send your staff to get those information. Or none of other bosses response to your email. Some may mark your mail as spam. Or when others keep on declining your meeting invitation or doesn't response at all.
And, you'll know FOR SURE that you're a piece of shit when you start saying, "Bullshit laaa... everyone is bullshit!" Yes, everyone is bullshit to you but, the company is still in operation. So, who's the bullshit here?
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Hiring mistake!
You've been struggling to come to terms with your boss. Every conversation will eventually turn to a high-pitch argument. Even a friendly gesture like, "How are you" may end up with "Mind your own business!" And at the end of every conversation, or argument, both you and your boss leave the room with the expression "I want to kill you!" written on both faces.
And you've been wondering. Whether, it is your boss is the one who is really suck? Or is it you are the one who is incompetent to handle pressures?
But, you'll have the answer of what you've been wondering all this while. When you hear your boss' boss admits that hiring your boss was a mistake. And your boss' boss describes your boss, among all (the stupids, all the f words, idiots), your boss is NOT TACTFUL. Yes, your boss is NOT TACTFUL! But, that's still the most polite way of describing your boss.
So, stop wondering. You're GOOD! It is your boss who SUCKS!
tactful = lacking or showing a lack of what is fitting and considerate in dealing with others
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Mentally sick!
During festive seasons, many of us are organizing open houses by inviting friends, colleagues and relatives for a feast, whether it is in a small or large scale. Being courteous, you still send the invitation to the dumb-ass, marrow sucking boss to your open house.
And you know your boss is mentally sick or at least having a brain capability of worse than of an 8-year old kid and you feel like dumping your boss head into the toilet bowl full of shit when he says that people organize open houses to SHOW OFF! And if your boss still turn up during your open house, just say to him FUCK OFF!
(note: this is a real story between my current Senior Vice President and my colleague, a Vice President who has already resigned from the company)
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Really smart or real ass?
Consider these two situations:
1. When there is a situation where you need to come up with an idea/suggestion/recommendation collectively as a team/department, your boss says, "So, you think lah what we can do about it. I have some ideas, but I let you think first, then we exchange ideas."
2. During the supposed exchanging ideas session, you tell your boss your ideas/suggestions. And your boss says, "Aahh... I was thinking the same way..."
Crap!
So if these happen to you, do you think your boss is really smart or a real ass?
Mine is real ass.
Monday, September 15, 2008
When the boss is not balanced!
Saturday, September 13, 2008
The fading bootlicker
If you're a boss and love to be licked all around, you have to also understand well enough the signs of your bootlickings leaving you.
Clue:
If a bootlicker nods to all your questions/opinions/ideas, it doesn't mean he/she agrees with you but he/she is just fed-up with you that soon he/she will be leaving you.
Example scenario:
Boss: You'll be in KL tomorrow, right?
Bootlicker: (nod)
Boss: So when is your flight to KL?
Bootlicker: (silent)
Boss: Is it on Thursday night?
Bootlicker: Yes.
Boss: And when will your return to JB?
Bootlicker: (silent)
Boss: Monday morning is it?
Bootlicker: (nod)
Boss: Or is it on Tuesday morning?
Bootlicker: (nod)
Boss: (confused) So, when is it?
Bootlicker: hmmm... Tuesday morning.

